Domestic mobile phone that Apple infringing Apple sued Beijing Bureau of known capacity

Refusing to accept the Beijing Intellectual Property Office made a "patent infringement dispute settlement decision," Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Beijing complex telecommunications equipment limited liability company filed an administrative lawsuit to Beijing Intellectual Property Court. Beijing Intellectual Property Office decision in this book and found iPhone6 ​​iPhone6 ​​Plus two phones design violated Burley's patents and ordered Apple to stop selling, offering for sale in the complex and the company to stop selling infringing products. Domestic mobile phone that Apple infringement Previously, a company called Burley to Beijing Intellectual Property Office, the company is the patent number ZL201430009113.9, the name "mobile phone (100C)" design patent of the patentee. The company believes that the complex company affiliated stores offering for sale and sale of two mobile phones iPhone6 ​​and iPhone6 ​​Plus design violated the rights enjoyed by its own request Beijing Intellectual Property Bureau ordered Apple and multiplexing companies to stop offering for sale and above sales practices. May 10 this year, according to the Beijing Municipal Intellectual Property Office, "after the patent administrative enforcement measures" the case and render a "patent infringement dispute settlement decision." Known production bureau ordered to stop selling Beijing Intellectual Property Office that, after comparison, Apple's iPhone6 ​​iPhone6 ​​Plus and two phones with Li Bai's "mobile phone (100C)" Although there are a number of differences, but belong to the average consumer is difficult to notice small difference, it should be recognized no significant difference between the two, involved falling within the scope of patent protection. Accordingly, the Beijing Intellectual Property Office under the provisions of "People's Republic of China Patent Law" Article 60, that "...... unwilling to consult or the consultation fails, the patentee or interested party may bring a suit before a people's court to be requesting the administrative authority for patent affairs processing patent administrative department ...... the infringement established, it may order the infringer to immediately stop the infringement ...... "decision, and ordered Apple to stop selling the company to stop complex offering for sale and sale infringing products. Apple sued known production bureau After the decision, Apple and the company pleaded complex, and in accordance with relevant provisions of the "Administrative Procedure Law", administrative litigation Beijing Intellectual Property Court, asking the court to revoke the respondent decided according to the law, while declaring the accused infringing product iPhone6, iPhone6 Plus two phones do not fall into the scope of protection of the patent involved. Apple and the companies are considered complex, the presence of Apple's two phones and Burley's phone numerous significant difference between the two is neither identical nor similar. In addition, Burley patent litigation is invalid in a separate case review administrative proceedings related to opinions contrary to the idea of ​​the present case, it is asking the court to revoke the respondent decided according to the law, also asked to declare the alleged infringing product did not fall within the scope of protection of the patent involved . Reporters learned yesterday from the intellectual property court, the hospital has Beijing Intellectual Property Office served a notice of the respondent. The case is under further investigation. ■ expert interpretation 6 Apple would ban it? So, in accordance with the decisions of the Beijing Intellectual Property Office, does this mean the future of Litigation iPhone6, iPhone6 ​​Plus will prohibit the sale of it? Reporters also interviewed a Beijing trade law firm specializing in intellectual property lawyers Luzhao Wen Lu lawyer told reporters, according to the relevant provisions of the patent law, if the court ruled in favor of the entry into force of the Beijing Intellectual Property Office made the decision, then Apple's two phone models accused of infringement will not continue to be sold in Beijing geographical scope. However, due to the specific administrative act made by the Beijing Intellectual Property Office is generally effective only in Beijing geographical area, so I decided to make Beijing Intellectual Property Office, and in other places in addition to Beijing and not directly produce legal ban as a result of. But lawyers said Lu, the entry into force of the decision made by Beijing Intellectual Property Office, the department other parts of the administration of patent work has referential significance. In addition, due to the current Beijing Intellectual Property Court trial of the case is the first instance procedure, if the losing party may continue to appeal, so the Beijing Intellectual Property Court verdict, does not necessarily lead to the allegedly infringing Apple's two phones banned in Beijing legal consequences. Frozen Games - Juegos de Frozen - Jogos de Frozen - Permainan Frozen - Игры Холодное сердце
Giochi di Frozen - Frozen Spelletjes - Gry Kraina lodu - Elsa Spiele - Jeux de Frozen - Elsa Oyunlari